A patent does not necessarily confer market power
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. case. The decision reflects a changing view of tying arrangements and of the degree of market power conferred by intellectual property rights. The Supreme Court concluded that the mere possession of a patent does not necessarily confer market power upon the patentee: in all cases involving a tying arrangement, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant has market power in the tying product.
Table of contents
- I. Background
- II. The «tying arrangements» context
- III. Presumption of market power for patentees?
Loggen Sie sich bitte ein, um den ganzen Text zu lesen.
Es gibt noch keine Kommentare
Ihr Kommentar zu diesem Beitrag
AbonnentInnen dieser Zeitschrift können sich an der Diskussion beteiligen. Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare verfassen zu können.
0 Kommentare